1. What do Sugar Daters Do Together with her? Intercourse versus. Relationships

The fresh survey contains 24 short finalized-concluded and you may quick discover-finished questions, in addition to background variables. The previous questions attained details about event out of financial exchanges, volume and you may level of times, demographic record, including, like, sex, age, and intimate positioning ( Dining table step one), motives to own sugar dating ( Dining table dos), and you can event regarding giving otherwise having fun with companion qualities. Most were looking for heterosexual plans, but the heterosexual liking are stronger among the many male respondents (97 per cent) than one of several female respondents (61 percent). Whilst the ages maximum to join up on the website are 18, 10 % of females said are young than simply 18 (14–17) (come across Desk step 1, Contour step one and you may Contour dos). six New unlock-concluded issues handled brand new meanings and you can reasons as much as glucose relationship. This new interviews therefore the questionnaire was basically conducted within the Swedish. Gunnarsson interpreted studies are cited into the English.

Investigation

The interview additionally the survey studies had been examined qualitatively. As the interview data considering even more breadth, the fresh new survey analysis given breadth. Particular proportions of the newest survey study have been examined quantitatively, eg, age, gender, and you can sexual positioning. Interviews transcriptions and qualitative questionnaire responses was processed inside the NVivo due to a combination of investigation-motivated and you can design-passionate programming. The issue away from simple tips to identify glucose relationship (especially in reference to prostitution) together with problem of instrumental compared to. built-in reasons were conceptually input the new programming processes. Analytical memo composing was applied so you’re able to document patterns and interesting templates throughout coding plus a far more alternative discovering of your own issue. Based on the observation the situation illustrated all kinds of techniques and you can feel, we sought out a means of categorizing these differences. It became clear the knowledge failed to are very different with each other that solitary axis, so, in lieu of dividing her or him towards the that selection of categories (cf. Scull 2020), we chose to cardio the study about three secret size one to emerged as the utmost definitive organizers of your differentiations: (1) The new fundamental articles out-of sugar dating arrangements: What do sugar daters would together? (2) The latest forms of payment with it: Just how try “babies” compensated? and you can (3) “Babies’” motivational known reasons for sugar relationship: About what the amount create they participate in the fresh plan because of the information presented experts otherwise while they see those activities when you look at the and you will regarding on their own? Throughout the adopting the, the interview and you will questionnaire studies was examined jointly with respect to certain types of sugar dating relating to for every differentiating measurement. If at all possible, quantity are given regarding the frequency each and every group certainly members. Mention, even if, that quantity are not always member of your broader people regarding glucose daters, and that users will can’t be perfectly put into categories, because so many keeps a range of additional feel therefore the issues driving the information age group just weren’t built to matches so it article’s logical size.

Overall performance

The original measurement central getting distinguishing ranging from varieties of sugar matchmaking inquiries the brand new simple blogs of one’s sugar relationship plan. The fresh new starting regarding glucose relationship can be divided into about three categories. In the 1st classification, we find a mere sexual deal; on 2nd, “babies” and “daddies” is engaged in a more complete matchmaking arrangement and gender but in addition to other things; from the 3rd, this new events mingle within the a matchmaking-like style, but sex is not an element of the arrangement .

Gender Only

50 % of this new “baby” interviewees (7 out-of fifteen) and one “daddy” interviewee (step one out of 9) equated sugar dating either on the straightforward selling and buying regarding sex, or advertised playing with glucose adult dating sites for this purpose, because the only way of using the site otherwise as one ways yet others. About questionnaire responses, thirteen per cent from “baby” participants and you will step 3 per cent off “daddy” respondents unambiguously equated glucose matchmaking having prostitution or attempting to sell/to purchase gender. When inquired about great things about sugar dating compared to the other styles away from relationships, one to survey respondent stated, “It is not a form of dating [smiley]; you offer and purchase sex” (“baby,” 28). A recurrent motif throughout the situation is that sugar matchmaking try a glossy safety to have prostitution, since the articulated of the other questionnaire respondent: “This is exactly prostitution. We have been on the thinking-deceit. Nobody folks desires telephone call ourselves hooker or john. So we altered the language and you may released they from inside the a better package” (“kid,” 25). So it harsh good sense regarding “the actual characteristics” regarding sugar dating contrasts into the focus regarding past look on the exactly how glucose daters often delimit their work regarding prostitution and intercourse really works ( Chu and you will Laidler 2016; Nayar 2017) and will feel associated with Swedish mass media, in which sugar relationships since a wages having prostitution might have been a beneficial repeated motif ( Olsson 2019; Svenska Dagbladet 2017).